Showing Pathways for query: 'technology response'
Searched: in measures.
||USCA Case #21-1021 Document #1880397 Filed: 01/15/2021 Page 1 of 47 IN UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, and SIERRA CLUB, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 21-1021 Case No. ______ PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to Clean Air Act 307(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1), Federal Ru||IHS Markit||, dates in their analysis , level of the standard , costs associated with certification , production and new type , docket for this action , technologies from most cost , dates for new type , engines used on covered , faa and the department , party to this action , service were the airbus , general||31-Jan-2021||auto-generated|
||2136 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 6 / Monday, January 11, 2021 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 87 and 1030 [EPA HQ OAR 2018 0276; FRL 10018 45 OAR] RIN 2060 AT26 Control of Air Pollution From Airplanes and Airplane Engines: GHG Emission Standards and Test Procedures AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is adopting greenhouse gas (GHG) emission standards applicable to certain c||IHS Markit||, dates in their analysis , level of the standard , costs associated with certification , production and new type , technologies from most cost , dates for new type , engines used on covered , service were the airbus , standards at appropriate levels , level as the airplane , number for the public ,||31-Jan-2021||auto-generated|
||IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Illinois, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Minnesota, State of New Jersey, State of New York, State of Oregon, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Vermont, State of Washington, District of Columbia, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent. Petitioners, v. PETITION FOR REVIEW Case No. 21-____ Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure||IHS Markit||, production of that design , engines having a maximum , docket for this action , airplane are not constant , improvements to the metric , constant across all airplanes , general for the district , agency of the united , costs associated with certification , date of the final , dates in their analys||31-Jan-2021||auto-generated|