Showing Pathways for query: 'interest person'
Searched: in measures.
||Case 4:21-cv-00003-BMM Document 36 Filed 01/27/21 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND; MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER; and CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ENERGY, Plaintiffs, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; and ANDREW R. WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants. vs. INTRODUCTION 4:21-cv-03-BMM ORDER Environmental Defense Fund ( EDF ), Monta||IHS Markit||, rule as a procedural , rule that merely provides , provides that the epa , requirement because the rule , rule rather than procedural , epa in its regulatory , epa through those statutes , epa s own science , rule from the federal , rules without following apa , court for the district , rules unde||31-Jan-2021||auto-generated|
||Rules and Regulations This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10 CFR Part 1021 [DOE HQ 2020 0017] RIN 1990 AA49 National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures AGENCY: Office of th||IHS Markit||, act on that information , effect of this document , policy of the executive , proposed changes on agency , authority under the nga , states that the policy , effects of its export , comments on the notice , rulemaking and this final , regulations not consider effects , effects for any proposed , i||31-Jan-2021||auto-generated|
||ORAL ARGUMENT HAS NOT BEEN SCHEDULED In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Nos. 17-1236 & 17-1240 (consolidated) __________ SIERRA CLUB, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. __________ ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF ORDERS OF THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION __________ RESPONDENT S OPPOSITION TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY AND TO EMERGENCY PETITION UNDER ALL WRITS ACT __________ November 16, 2017 James P. Danly General Counsel Ro||IHS Markit||, petition to this court , stay a different pipeline , policy and the commission , gas in the public , order in this case , statement and the certificate , orders of the federal , stay of the project , gas that the pipelines , statement for the project , stay of the commission , pipeline co. v. ferc||21-Apr-2021||auto-generated|